Do Britishers feel guilty about atrocities committed by their forefathers in the past in various countries during their rule?

Most followers are Hindus- or rather, Atheists with Hindu names considering the kind of Indians who frequent Kora… And how someone can answer such questions from the perspective of other nationalities is beyond me. Cosmopolitanism is the delusion of degenerates; no man can escape his birth.

Anyways.

As Ferguson's poll on this very matter showed: No.

Infact most are pretty much pleased as punch about their murderous Colonial Empire and can't wait for it to come back. Lelwa.

As they should be.

From day one, you've been told that the law of Kali Yuga is Matsya Nyaya- big fish eating smaller fish. From day one, you've been told about the parable of the Wolf and Lamb- not that ridiculous Almana version but the original Hindu story they took it from- where the Wolf rips the Lamb from limb to limb and eats it's still-beating heart. From day one, you've been told again and again that the Kali Yuga is terrible and you must be terrible yourself or it'll only be moral for others to destroy it. The very minute Indra was born, he demanded of his mother who the notorious of the Age were, and then went and beat them to death with a broken chariot wheel, but some racist bald sex-obsessed luddite in a loincloth has told Hindus that virtue lies in women, being raped by Peacefuls, lying quietly and not distribing their tormentors overmuch.

Like the Pandit in the sinking boat, you're engaged in telling the boatman the morally right way of jumping into the river, lest the fish are disturbed.

The hunter of the Malayavat told Bhima thousands of years ago that to live was to kill and to kill was to live. But you, the great Hindu, are more virtuous than a Pandava, more luminous than an Aditya, more wise than Chanakya, and more illustrous than Emperor Vikrama himself.

Why shouldn't be the… what kind of nonsense is the word “Britisher”… be proud of their Empire?

Millions died in each of their famines as they forced half the farms to grow opium and exported the rice in the other half, but the pox of existence for our great leaders and Intellectuals is the poor Brahmin in his temple. In his words and by his own hand, Aurangzeb and his fellow Mughals boasted how they've destroyed Hindu temples and looted Hindu wealth, but the root of all troubles is the Rajput and the Bania who kept faith as the nation burnt.

Why shouldn't be your “Britishers” be proud?

Some dimwit who'd never been to the Continent cooked up an Aryan Invasion theiry and our great educated classes swear its truth.

Modern Kannadas are engaged in changing prayers to Tipu Sultan, Jihadi and mass murderer extraordinaire, but the East India Company ended his reign of terror.

Modern Keralites can't help spewing bile against Hinduism and cheering Peacefuls ac they hacked them to death, stole their property, and raped their women- but the British Raj put an end to this crimes.

Clive and co murdered half of Tamil Nadu but some imbecile with a skull - one of their great leaders - wants to go to meet Elizabeth II for “help” against murderous Hindus since white-skinned Christ was more Dravidian than Shri Rama whom they garland with shoes.

Kashmir went from the stronghold of Shiva, Surya, and Saraswati to a land with less than 10% Hindus but the minute the British left, it turned full-fledged Caliphate as the great Indian Army looked on and no one cheers this more than our educated modern enlightened Kashmiri pandits.

For hundreds of years, Pune fought and suffered under the Peacefuls and British buntge anger of the modern Maratha is against the Brahmin and none else- doesn't matter that it was a Brahmin who brought them to their peak of power.

Lahore was the Paris of the East, and every four shops and industries out of five was owned by Hindus and Sikhs. None of that wealth- most of it earned under the British- saved any pagan from death or destitution but modern. Hindus believe that drinking Chai and preaching Vikas will make them Arhanta.

Yes, the British massacred millions of Hindus. So what? The Sarayu turned red when Mulayam, hero of the educated classes, told the great Indian police, paid by Hindu money, to slaughter Karsevaks.

Yes, the British had kangaroo courts where no Hindu could get justice. So what? Our great <<REDACTED>> wake up at 2 AM to hear appeals from outright Jihadis while Hindus languish years in prisons under nonsense like 498a. Wait till the Minority Rights Protection nonsense comes, and see what happens.

Yes, the British looted trillions of rupees from Hindus. So what? Hindus pour money into an army which sits around, jerking off, as Hindus are systematically cleansed in State after State. Is an IAS officer superior to an ICS one just because his skin is browner? Clearly not, the ICS officer wouldn't have allowed the Chinese to enter Tibet, let alone Arunachal Pradesh.

Let's not speak of Bengal. What can one say about them that remains to be said!

Murderous pack of looters the British Raj might've been but how exactly is the great Republic of India better for Hindus?

WW2 India was more industrialized than most European nations but the great leaders of the Hindus shanked the Bania in the side. Naxals and NGOs and Missionaries have overrun the villages but the great leaders of the Hindus drove Zamindars off their lands. Brahmins are to blame for every crime under the sun but Heavens forbid we say a word about those who'd ordered Hindus to open their mouths for them to spit into.

“Discrimination” these educated classes screech, but as far as I can see our holy land has been “discriminated” into three already, and there's yet more coming if the censuses are any sign. And while that happens, they've first “discriminated” Brahmins from Hindus; then it'll be UCs against the rest, then OBCs from SCs/ STs. Then every “original Indian from before Aryans” will do a Jogi Mandal and clean toilets in a mosque and sell his daughters in sec slave markets, I suppose.

Modern Hindus on Kora rant over Islamabad and Beijing and pre-WW2 London but methinks, like any sane person would, than they're not half as poisonous for Hindu existence as Calcutta and Delhi.

If I were one of your “Britishers”, I'd be damned proud of the old Empire. No succeeding state was as secure and safe for Hindus.